78- "QUID PRO QUO....".....

A) You've been seeing this Latin legal phrase bantered about for a couple of weeks!
Means..."Something for something." "You do something for me, I'll do something for you!"
Pennsylvania Congressman Joe Sestak publicly declared, months ago, that "someone" in the White House had offered him a JOB if he would not oppose, directly or indirectly, a U.S. Senator to run in a Democratic primary for the seat in the Senator's Pennsylvania state. Sestak, for months, refused to tell publicly who asked him not to oppose the Senator. He was told, if he would stay IN the House of Reps, he would receive something, no matter what it was.
B) It is against the law! And the real problem, now, it appears, is a cover-up. Now the SPIN, beginning this week and especially this past Friday, is moving fast...trying to cover ALL tracks. Does anyone remember back in the early '70s when a small D.C. breakin along the Potomac River turned into the only resignation ever when a cover-up began?
C) Notice that, this past Friday afternoon, that a "rationalization" was brought out in the news media on a Friday afternoon and at the beginning of a big three-day holiday????
D) It is, now, a necessity that a non-White House examination of this bumbling, stumbling affair with the "Quid pro quo" issue.
E) Our American DESERVES an indepth review NOT based on the White House announcing that nothing happened, that "they" are clear of any wrongdoing!
F) .....and to our White House? This WILL NOT be swept under the rug, Chicago-style!!